Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matthew Braham's avatar

Making public this circle is probably the most important move that can be made at the moment. For it is they that bear the responsibility for this debacle. They have jointly and severally brought a world renowned institution of higher learning into disrepute and they ought to bear the consequences of their choices.

One need only look at what is happening:

https://x.com/julianhuppert/status/2084243613374947651?s=20

But the list is incomplete: every single examiner and member of a selection committee that was involved in any of Arday's hires along the way to his Cambridge appointment should also be held to account.

In this whole sorry affair we read of "institutions". This masks that there are actual people making actual choices. And each does indeed stand answerable.

Matthew Braham's avatar

I have taken your initiative Eric, and wrote to all these electors as well, pointing them to the Bayreuth affair that I posted elsewhere. Here is the text of my letter:

Dear Colleague,

It has come to my attention that you may have been involved in the appointment of Jason Arday. In this regard, that appointment has brought Cambridge University’s reputation into disrepute. The following X-feed had nearly 0.5m views this morning:

https://x.com/julianhuppert/status/2084243613374947651?s=20

The affair is harming the entire academic community.

In this regard, the affair took me back to Bayreuth in 2011, when a regional Bavarian university found itself at the centre of a national crisis. Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg — Defence Minister, poster boy of the CSU, the Bavarian half of Merkel's then coalition — was exposed for plagiarising his doctorate. I watched my own university blink. It stripped the degree, but on narrow administrative grounds, declining to find that the he had deliberately deceived. The technical route minimised the damage to him.

What saved Bayreuth's integrity, however, was that its own professors refused to accept this. Oliver Lepsius, the constitutional lawyer who then held the Bayreuth chair of Guttenberg's own supervisor and has since moved to Münster, said publicly what the institution would not: "We feel deceived. We were taken in by a fraudster." The dam broke there. Pressure from the professoriate built through the following weeks, and my friend and colleague Rainer Hegselmann, professor of philosophy and the driving force behind the Philosophy & Economics degree that made Bayreuth internationally known, wrote to the University President: "by such finesses the university effectively makes itself the accomplice of a fraudster" (“Komplize eines Betrügers”). The university's own commission concluded in May 2011 that the deception had indeed been deliberate. It did not get there on its own.

The lesson for Cambridge is that no institution has ever protected its reputation by protecting misconduct. Deference to a powerful politician and deference to a high-profile professor produce the same result: the erosion of public trust, and with it the value of every degree the institution confers. Bayreuth is no Cambridge. But when the moment came, its professors did their duty.

Sincerely,

Matthew Braham

286 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?