X, the former Twitter, has sued an advertising trade assocation, GARM, for antitrust (anti-monopoly) violations along with several corporations that participated in the boycott.
Seems like Elon's most obvious countermove is to publish a list of GARM's constituency. Then it's up to us to decide whether to continue patronizing them.
Also, if GARM's organizer(s) are known, they would be vicariously liable for GARM's torts. So while GARM may no longer exist, it's creator(s) do(es).
Seems like Elon's most obvious countermove is to publish a list of GARM's constituency. Then it's up to us to decide whether to continue patronizing them.
Also, if GARM's organizer(s) are known, they would be vicariously liable for GARM's torts. So while GARM may no longer exist, it's creator(s) do(es).
I'd like to offer a point: if one cannot sue people for not giving something, one should not also sue people for removing something.